Live Help
Want to know more
Enter the details and we'll call you soon

Name :

Company Name :

City :

Mobile No. :

Email id :

  

Thank you for your details



Our Executive will reach you shortly.

Your Session Will Expire in   seconds.
If you do not wish to log-out, choose 'Let me continue'
Reset SessionCancel Session
 

Petitioner who was liable to pay more than 100 cr to bank wasn’t entitled to discretionary relief under article 226

September 8, 2020[2020] 119 taxmann.com 63 (Karnataka)
115 Views

IBC: Where petitioner-company defaulted in repayment of loan taken from bank and was making efforts to dodge recovery proceedings by giving false assurances of exploring possibility of settling matter and for this sought 13 adjournments in section 7 application filed by respondent, since petitioner was liable to pay more than Rs.100 crores, however, had remained steadfast 'not to pay' any money, petitioner would not be entitled for discretionary relief under article 226 of Constitution of India

read more

taxmann.com
Payment
Best view in 1140 x 768